
I’m frantically trying to finish a book chapter to present at Beyond 400: An Exploration of Baptist Futures. It’s a conference at the Vose Seminary here in Perth in a few weeks time, celebrating 400 years of the Baptist movement. Nigel Wright from Spurgeon’s College is the guest speaker, and there will, no doubt, be a diverse range of views about the best way forward for Baptists at the start of the 21st century.
My chapter – The Little Church That Could – is, not surprisingly, an appeal to consider deliberately small church as an integral part of what any Baptist future might look like here in Australia. However it is taking a more nuanced approach than simply saying do church small. Rather than isolated individual congregations, the approach is more a series of networks that comprise local households. The leaders of each congregation in the network work and plan together, but the bulk of church life; mission, communion, Bible teaching, church discipline, baptism, is carried out at the local level, deliberately aiming at living life under the radar, each congregation embedding itself in its community and looking for ways to do low key Christian life and witness together. There is a strength in having a wider network, indeed it can lead to larger gatherings for specific purposes, and it allows a corporate strength for some training/missional activities.
The term “under the radar” is deliberate, and I suspect, not where some people might see the future for Baptist churches. In the move to grow healthy churches, church growth is seen as desirable. There is a concerted push to put churches on the radar, bulking up their influence and attractional capabilities. Whilst I have no particular beef with this aim, I believe it is does not take seriously enough just how off the radar church is in Australia, no matter what we do. I once attended a leadership meeting hosted by one of the biggest churches here in Perth and the visiting speaker made the following statement: “I’ve had heart troubles. I wonder what it would say in your newspapers tomorrow if I dropped dead on stage.” I wrote down “Headline in The West Australian, Page 12: Person You’ve Never Heard of Dies in Place You’ve Never Been To”. If they even bothered to write it up. Like it or not that is the reality. Even for a church of the size and influence of the one we were sitting in at the time Christians are not on the radar of 95 per cent of the population. The worrisome aspect of that fact is not that we aren’t on the radar, but that leaders such as the one who made that statement don’t seem to be aware that we are not. Doing big church has an internal plausibility structure to it that blinds its adherents to the fact that no one outside is walking past saying “If I never go to church, that’s the one I’m never going to.”
My concern as such isn’t for the future of these big churches – they will chug along just fine. Rather it is for the myriad smaller churches that are told by church growth spokesmen that if a little church is an orange and a big church is an apple, the trick is to behave like an apple whilst you are still an orange. The idea here being that if you start to do all the “look big” stuff then actual big will follow and you will have made the leap to big church nirvana and all the influence, pulling power and “on the radar” benefits that brings.
The orange/apple line doesn’t work on at least two fronts. The first is burn-out. The end result of orange to apple is less likely to be an apple sized church and more likely to be stewed apples. The primary problem for the average Christian family is busyness. Middle Australia is time-poor, over-scheduled and running on emotional fumes. Orange to apple church requires huge reserves of the one thing we don’t seem to be able to make for ourselves - time.
But secondly, and this works at a deeper substructural level, the attempt to put church “on the radar” ignores the fact that for most of their lives the vast majority of Australians live their lives under the radar. The advertising industry does its best to present hyper-reality as the norm, lulling us to believe that other people (who buy their products) are living intense, pleasurable, highly intentional technicoloured lives, and you too could be living that way, if you sign up now. Run-of-the-mill life doesn’t get much of a look in in Ad-land.
It doesn’t take much to see how this has influenced church. Check out the pictures on the web pages of some of the apple sized churches if you want proof: intensity and liminality are often the order of the day. But they are not the order of the day for the average suburbanite; average is. If the community of God’s people is in any way going to engage with the vast majority of Australians, then the bulk of the work will have to be done under the radar. As Steve Timmis is wont to say “Little bits of gospel light will have to seep into the nooks and crannies of the city (or suburb) and dispel the darkness that the light on the hill sweeps over.” If that is to happen then the future of the baptist movement must include myriad intentionally little churches flying under the radar and quite happy to remain as oranges.
There you have it. Now to flesh it all out into about five and a half thousand words.
written by Steve
Recent Comments